home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 1994 19:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
- From: Timothy Miller <millert@undergrad.csee.usf.edu>
- Subject: Re: How-To-Vote [ADMIN]
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- In-Reply-To: <199406182223.AA12921@world.std.com>
- Message-Id: <Pine.3.87.9406181950.B1333-0100000@grad>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- Clauss:
- -----------------
- No. (I hope so ;-)
- I like the way 7up V2.2 (a German shareware texteditor) solves the
- 'dangerous' Ctrl-A problem:
- You just selected the whole text with Ctrl-A. If you type any letter now,
- 7up will ask in an alert box if you really want to overwrite the whole
- text. 7up doesn't ask, if you delete, cut or move the marked text.
-
- In this way, there is no danger in Ctrl-A. What do you think about it,
- Timothy? Maybe, we can stop the Ctrl-A discussion if we agree that all
- programers should support this (or a similar) method to prevent the loss
- of the text by mistake.
- ------------------
- Once again, you are doing MORE work, writing more code, making up new
- KLUDGES and a whole bunch of other garbage simply for the sake of saving
- Ctrl-A. Keeping Ctrl-A just isn't so important that we have to go out of
- our way to keep it. The simple and best solution is to get rid of it.
- Change it to Shift-Ctrl-A, and you will have solved ALL of your problems
- in ONE STEP!
-
-
- Neil:
- ----------------
- >No! I hate the "throw another dialog box at the problem" solution. It
- >reminds me of the Mac disk formatting 3 dialog nightmare. Next there
- >will be the "are you really sure you want to do that?" dialog, then we'll
- >see a dialog after every keypress asking "did you really mean to type the
- >letter g?" I prefer the other way.
-
- Exactly - safety guards like this are an excuse for poor design.... The
- answer
- is to get rid of the Windows/Mac 'big cursor' motion.... It really is a pain
- when it comes to writing long documents - in File Selectors it is fine, but
- otherwise, forget it.
- ----------------
- You CAN get rid of a well-accepted standard block-handling method simply
- for the sake of saving Ctrl-A, but making a fundamental change in the way
- blocks are handled will be FAR more devistating to the user than changing
- something as simple and seldom used as Ctrl-A.
-
-
- Chris:
-
- >I think that changing select all to control shift A is not only the
- >simplest, but also the most "elegant" solution, since it does not
-
- Yes, definately the most elegant.
-
- >require more dialogs (gee, I just hit control a when typing dialogs and
- >screen redrew the window. control a strikes again) or eliminating the
- >well-accepted "big cursor" paradigm or changing it to have different
- >contextual meanings depending on whether one has selected the entire
-
- Yes, I like the big-cursor system. Changing Select-All to something
- other than Ctrl-A is easy. Making fundamental changes in the way blocks
- are handled is far more devastating. Besides that, deciding which block
- paradigm to use is beyond the scope of this standard... we should cater
- to all of them, and since some (many) will be using the big-cursor
- system, then we should make sure it's safe for them. And as pointed out
- above, Ctrl-A DOES happen by accident! If it's assigned to something
- harmless like Redraw Window, then it's just great. Additionally, making
- the user memorize MORE shortcuts to handle blocks independantly of
- regular text just won't work, and it wastes 'space' on the keyboard that
- we could use for more useful short-cuts.
-
- >document or only part of it. I _like_ double clicking on words and
- >replacing them by just typing. I do that many times in Atariworks, as
-
- I am technical editor of Processor Direct Magazine. I do a LOT of
- editing. Robert Fernandez and I edit the articles on paper, then I am
- the one with the job of making the changes in the document in Atari
- Works. It's very often that I double-click-drag to select and change or
- delete text by the word-unit. I have gotten to the point where I have
- begun writing an editor that is specifically for writers and editors that
- makes what WE do most efficient. (As TWP writers staff knows, I wrote a
- prototype and gave it to them.) I am often faced with simply replacing a
- word. I have to find it with the mouse, so I double-click on it with the
- mouse then type in the new word.
-
- I am also frequently plagued with that Shift-Backspace problem.
- Fortunately, I'm always working with a hard-copy in hand.
-
- >well as selecting areas and simply hitting backspace to delete them. THe
- >only real problem is control A and (to a much lesser extent) shift
- >backspace. But, UNDO solves both problems, and I'm getting in the habit
- >of hitting caps lock when I am going to type large amounts of things in
- >all caps. If we cannot agree on control shift a, then I think we should
- >leave it alone.
-
- I VERY frequently use the shift key to type in strings of caps. If it's
- just one word, I don't want to take the mental effort to find the
- CAPS-LOCK key (which I almost NEVER use), hit it, type in the word, then
- hit CAPS-LOCK again. I just automatically hold shift and type in the
- word. When I make a mistake, I also automatically hit backspace,
- instantly destroying my line. Since I then automatically correct my
- error, UNDO does nothing but remove the text that I just typed after
- hitting Shift-Backspace.
-
- For me, typing is an automatic thing. The less I think about it, the
- faster I am at it. I don't want dangerous shortcuts that may destroy
- things when I accedentally hit them, requiring me to think about what I
- hit. The only two things I'ave had any trouble with are Ctrl-A and
- Shift-Backspace, because those are the only two that I tend to hit
- accidentally while thinking about other things.
-
-
- Ofir:
- -------------
- Undo - Undo Last op
- Shift Undo - Redo last op
- CTRL Undo - Revert (abandon all changes and reload)
- -------------
- I like this.
-
-
- About the Close-Window and Cycle-Window options, I am not accustomed to
- having ANY options to do that, except for the Lattice C editor's Ctrl-V
- for cycle. I'm just waiting to see what you guys decide to determine
- what I'm going to use. Cycle-Window is very important to me, so I want
- it accessable from the keyboard. On the other hand, Close-Window isn't,
- and it's best to ask before closing, especially if it's not saved.
-
-
- Delete should Delete blocks. Don't make it hard on us, guys. I don't
- want to have to learn another key just to delete blocks.
-
-
- Nieber:
- ----------------
- As has been pointed out, the risk of data loss can be avoided. But even if
- there were something to this, changing shortcuts that are used by virtually
- every program on the ATARI and even on other platforms is simply out of the
- question. Most programmers just won't do it. Also remember that many app-
- lications on the ATARI are no longer supported, but still used, so dramatic
- changes like this will probably end with 50% of the used applications using
- the old way, the other 50% the new way. Don't do that. This also applies to
- CONTRL-U. An existing well-established standard, even if not perfectly
- designed, is better than different competing standards.
- -----------------
- The question is what change is more dramatic? Changing methods is
- major. Changing one shortcut is not. If you have to change philosophies
- because of ONE shortcut, something it wrong.
-
-
-
-